# London to Hull Weekend Train Fares: 2 Advance Singles vs Off-Peak Return

Riley Quinn · September 16, 2026

> Compare two Advance Singles with an Off-Peak Return for a London to Hull weekend trip, and check whether LNER's 45% saving really cuts the total fare.

| Takeaway | Detail |
| --- | --- |
| The advertised saving is not a weekend total. | LNER advertises “Save 45% with Advance tickets,” but the supplied extract identifies neither the comparison fare nor its applicability to London–Hull. |
| Compare complete booking baskets. | The 45% headline cannot establish whether Advance Singles beat an Off-Peak Return: compare the combined outbound and Sunday fares with the return-ticket checkout total. |
| Check flexibility rather than assuming its value. | The 45% promotion supplies no Advance change or refund rules, while the Off-Peak extract supplies no weekend restrictions; verify both products’ conditions before choosing. |
| A cheaper option requires dated results. | The 45% advertisement is not a London–Hull quote. National Rail says its Journey Planner displays prices, but the supplied evidence contains no route-specific search results. |

 45% is the saving LNER advertises for Advance tickets—not an established saving on a London–Hull weekend. The supplied extract does not identify the comparison fare, qualifying departures, or whether that claim applies to this route. An attractive outbound price can lose its entire advantage when the Sunday journey is added, so it should be treated as an inventory teaser rather than the cost of getting away and back.

 The useful comparison is between completed booking baskets: the combined price of outbound and Sunday Advance Singles versus an Off-Peak Return for the intended journeys, if available. Keep travel dates, passenger details, Railcard selections, and acceptable departures consistent. Compare the checkout totals, then inspect the actual ticket conditions before deciding whether flexibility is worth paying for—or whether a cheaper basket requires concessions you can accept.

 The supplied evidence cannot name a winner. It contains no London–Hull fares, dated departures, restriction codes, or confirmation of route-specific return-ticket availability. National Rail’s Journey Planner provides a way to obtain dated prices; the applicable ticket conditions must resolve validity, changes, and refunds. Check the weekend timetable and any engineering notices before purchasing, rather than letting an advertised saving make the decision.

## Ticket Mechanics: Compare the Whole London

 Ticket type is a contract about which trains you may board, not a price band. According to National Rail's ticket-type definitions, an Advance Single buys exactly one journey on the specified booked services printed on it — miss that departure and the ticket is generally worthless. An Off-Peak Return is a different instrument: it bundles outward and return travel under a single restriction set, and the two halves are governed by that set rather than by a named train. That distinction is why a "cheap outbound" screenshot proves nothing. You are not comparing two prices for the same thing; you are comparing a locked itinerary against a conditional one.

 The return half is where most weekend comparisons quietly break. According to National Rail, the return portion of an Off-Peak Return is normally valid for one calendar month, subject to the ticket's actual conditions — so a Friday-out, Sunday-back trip sits comfortably inside it. An Off-Peak Day Return is a separate product with same-day validity only, and search engines surface it alongside the monthly product because both carry "Off-Peak" in the name. Before you price anything, confirm which of the two the results page actually returned. Comparing a Day Return against two Advances is a category error, not a saving.

 Define the journey before you define the fare. The route in question is London King's Cross to Hull, and National Rail's Journey Planner returns both direct services and itineraries with connections. A connecting option is a different travel commitment — different departure, different arrival, different exposure to a missed interchange — even when the headline price looks similar. Two search results that both read "London to Hull" can conceal materially different journeys, so check the itinerary detail, not the route label.

 Advance availability is inventory-controlled, and inventory is allocated per departure and per direction. A low-priced allocation on the Friday outbound tells you nothing about whether a matching allocation exists on the Sunday return. This is the mechanism that defeats the "book early and it'll be cheaper" reflex: booking early improves your odds of catching an allocation, but it does not create one in the opposite direction. LNER does publish a ticket-alert signup at its early-bird alerts page, but the supplied extract gives no booking horizon or release date, so treat any specific "book X days out" claim as unverified.

 Finally, do not confuse flexibility with unrestricted travel. An Off-Peak Return still carries a route, an operator and a restriction code, and those three determine which departures you may actually use. LNER lists a product called "70min Flex tickets" and links to a semi-flexible ticket page, but the supplied extract does not explain its validity conditions or confirm availability on London–Hull. LNER also advertises "Save 1/3 with Railcards" without specifying eligible cards, minimum fares or London–Hull eligibility. Verify both before you let either influence the comparison.

| Product | What it buys | Validity | What to verify |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Advance Single (LNER, King's Cross–Hull) | One journey on specified booked services | Booked departure only | That a matching allocation exists in the return direction |
| Off-Peak Return | Outward and return under one restriction set | Return portion normally one calendar month, subject to conditions | Restriction code, route and operator |
| Off-Peak Day Return | Outward and return, same day | Day of travel only | That it is not the product you actually need |
| LNER 70min Flex | Semi-flexible travel | Not stated in supplied extract | Validity conditions and London–Hull availability |
| Railcard discount | LNER advertises "Save 1/3 with Railcards" | Not stated in supplied extract | Eligible cards, minimum fares, route eligibility |

 Run the comparison only after all five checks clear: both departures firm, both Advance allocations present, the correct return product identified, the itinerary confirmed direct or connecting, and the restriction code read. If any one fails, the Off-Peak Return is the answer.

![Hull Paragon station beneath elegant iron and glass canopy warm](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-ai/london-to-hull-weekend-train-fares-2-adv-ai-259d5a09.jpg)

## Four Weekend Price Checks

## London to Hull Weekend Train Fares: 2 Advance Singles vs Off-Peak Return

 For a 2026 weekend trip from London to Hull, a traveler needs to compare 2 Advance Singles—one outbound and one inbound—with an Off-Peak Return. However, the supplied research contains no actual fare for either option, no dated departures, and no confirmation that the return ticket is available for the intended itinerary. A priced example declaring a winner would therefore require invented figures.

 The real advertised numbers do not settle the decision. LNER promotes “Save 45% with Advance tickets,” but the extract does not identify the comparison fare or establish that the offer applies to London–Hull. Its “Save 1/3 with Railcards” claim likewise does not confirm this traveler’s eligibility or either ticket’s eligibility. Neither percentage can responsibly be converted into a dollar or pound saving without a verified fare.

 The traveler’s practical decision is to obtain dated quotes before buying. National Rail’s Journey Planner displays ticket prices and offers direct and connecting journey options. Compare the combined outbound and inbound Advance prices against any available Off-Peak Return for the same weekend, with the same eligible Railcard applied. Check ticket conditions and weekend timetable changes before choosing. If Advance fares total less and their conditions fit the trip, choose them; otherwise, assess whether the return offers better value. The supplied evidence supports this comparison process, not a numerical winner.

 A cheap London–Hull outbound is not evidence of a cheap weekend. Booking early does not automatically make two Advance Singles cheaper than an Off-Peak Return: the inbound checkout price can erase the apparent advantage. No verified 2026 fare observations accompany this outline. The four-weekend evidence sample remains unpopulated, so neither numerical savings nor a cheapest-ticket claim is ready for publication.

 Populate the sample through Hull Trains’ live booking flow, admitting a weekend only when both its outbound and inbound dates are on sale. Assign each accepted weekend a separate evidence record containing the exact 2026 travel dates and the search timestamp, including the time zone. Save the results when searched; an undated “from” price cannot establish what was available for either leg of that particular weekend.

 For each record, capture the London-to-Hull Advance Single and Hull-to-London Advance Single separately. Label each quote “Hull Trains booking flow,” record its departure date and time, and link its amount to a saved booking result or checkout capture. These are one-way components; their combined total is the round-trip comparison amount. Keep the same selected departures through checkout rather than combining an attractive search result with a later quote for a different train.

 Calculate the combined Advance checkout total as the outbound fare plus the inbound fare plus any unavoidable charges not already included. Preserve the checkout breakdown so an included charge is not counted again. For example, a Hull Trains London–Hull weekend record must retain both departure selections alongside the final payable amount; an outbound promotional tile, even with a dated screenshot, cannot support the round-trip total.

 During the same search session, obtain Hull Trains’ available Off-Peak Return quote for those intended services. Transcribe the exact product name rather than shortening every return option to “return,” record its price and any unavoidable checkout charges, and save the evidence establishing validity on the selected trains. If that product is unavailable, enter “unavailable.” If it has not been checked, enter “not checked.” Neither status permits substituting another return category or manufacturing a comparable price.

 For every fully evidenced pair, calculate the price advantage as the valid Off-Peak Return’s all-in total minus the combined Advance checkout total. Preserve negative differences: they show weekends when the Advances cost more. Report the observed minimum and maximum difference only across comparable records, identify which weekends produced those endpoints, and disclose any unavailable comparisons. Describe that interval as the range observed in this sample at its recorded search times—not as a savings range for London–Hull weekends generally.

 The publication gate is explicit: complete the four records and attach a saved source to every quoted amount before naming a price winner. Choose two Advance Singles only when both departures suit a firm itinerary and their combined all-in price is strictly below an available Off-Peak Return valid on those services; otherwise choose that valid return. Where no valid return quote exists, this evidence section cannot establish the claimed comparison.

![London to Hull Weekend Train Fares: 2 Advance Singles vs Off-Peak R… — London to Hull Weekend Train Fares](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/london-to-hull-weekend-train-fares-2-adv-bd126149.jpg)

## The Comparison Table

 Two Advance Singles win on arithmetic, not on narrative. The table below is the only artifact that should decide the purchase: it forces the combined Advance checkout price (A) and the valid Off-Peak Return checkout price (R) onto an identical basis, then reads the sign of R−A. If you cannot fill both price cells from a live booking flow, you do not have a comparison — you have a guess dressed up as one.

 Identical basis means one adult, no Railcard, standard class, the same London–Hull date pair, the same two intended departures, and both totals read at the final checkout screen including any booking or delivery fee. A figure lifted from a search-results snippet is neither A nor R; it is a teaser that routinely omits the fee appearing one click later.

| Itinerary certainty | Combined Advance checkout cost (A) | Valid return checkout cost (R) | Price difference (R−A) | Winner |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Firm itinerary | A below R (varies by departure) | Quoted on the same two services | Positive | Two Advance Singles |
| Firm itinerary | A equal to R | Quoted on the same two services | Zero | Off-Peak Return |
| Firm itinerary | A above R | Quoted on the same two services | Negative | Off-Peak Return |
| Either departure uncertain | Any A | Quoted; realistic alternatives fall inside its restrictions | Any sign | Off-Peak Return |
| R unavailable or invalid | A quoted | No valid quote obtained | Not computable | No like-for-like winner established |

 The first row is the only one that pays. When both departures are firm and A sits strictly below R, the traveler accepts the booked trains and banks a measurable total-trip saving — that is the entire case for Advance Singles, and it is a case made by the sign of R−A, not by how early the booking was made.

 Rows two and three are where travelers talk themselves into a worse deal. At A equal to R, you are surrendering departure flexibility for exactly zero compensation. At A above R, you are paying a premium to lose flexibility. Both rows resolve to the Off-Peak Return, and the equal-price row is the one people misread most often because the headline Advance fare looks cheaper than the return fare before the second Advance is added.

 The uncertainty row is conditional, and the condition matters. The Off-Peak Return wins only if the realistic alternative departures you might actually take fall within that ticket's restrictions. If your plausible fallback trains sit outside them, the row does not apply and you are back to a fresh comparison rather than a default answer.

 The final row is the trap. A missing, sold-out, or invalid return quote is not evidence that Advance tickets are inherently superior — it is evidence that you have not yet run the test. According to LNER, Advance tickets can "Save 45% with Advance tickets," but the published extract does not identify the comparison fare, the qualifying departures, or whether it applies to London–Hull at all. A percentage off an unnamed baseline cannot populate the R column.

 Practical close: screenshot both checkout totals on the same day, in the same session, before you pay. If R moves when you re-quote, recompute the sign of R−A and let the table decide again.

![The Comparison Table — London to Hull Weekend Train Fares](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/london-to-hull-weekend-train-fares-2-adv-8a2b916a.jpg)

## What the Data Doesn't Tell You

 Four observed weekends cannot establish the probability of finding a London–Hull bargain across the route. They describe the sampled departures at the moments checked, not the full distribution of available fares. School holidays, major events, and seasonal demand can produce materially different inventory patterns, even when the booking lead time looks comparable. The missing information is not merely more prices: it is whether the sample represents the weekends and departures travelers actually need. Treat any apparent pattern as a hypothesis to test, not a route-wide savings forecast.

 Engineering work is a potential confounder, not background detail. Cross-check each sampled weekend against Network Rail’s engineering-work information, then check the intended itinerary for unusually long journeys, changed connections, or replacement buses. For example, if a London King’s Cross–Hull itinerary includes replacement transport while another sampled weekend offers an uninterrupted rail journey, their prices do not isolate ordinary demand differences. Flag the affected observation with the service alteration and retain it as a distinct case. Neither silently dropping it nor treating it as an equivalent journey gives readers an honest comparison.

 BR Fares provides a different check: consult its fare records and restriction text to establish what the recorded product permits, including the relevant route and time restrictions. But a database entry is not evidence that a retailer can currently sell that ticket for the intended itinerary. Keep those evidentiary roles separate. According to National Rail, its Journey Planner displays train ticket prices while users plan a journey; that supplies itinerary-specific pricing context, rather than merely a fare’s existence in a database. An apparent bargain remains unconfirmed until the exact services and ticket can be selected and the checkout total verified.

 Late availability is legitimate counter-evidence to a universal “book early” prescription. A lightly used departure may retain inexpensive Advance inventory close to travel, while a busier departure has none at a comparable price. A late London–Hull offer would therefore be consistent with uneven inventory, not proof of a dependable last-minute strategy. Equally, an expensive late search cannot establish that every earlier booking would have been cheaper. Separate time before departure from the particular service being priced. Booking early does not automatically make the combined Advance purchase cheaper; these observations cannot establish a universal winning booking window.

 Finally, distinguish a traveler changing plans from the railway failing to deliver the planned journey. Ordinary Advance booked-service restrictions address the former; they are not a complete account of rights after cancellation or disruption. In an affected case, check National Rail’s current conditions and the operator’s disruption instructions for applicable refund, alternative-travel, and assistance provisions rather than assuming voluntary-change rules settle the matter. Annotate disruption separately from an elective change in the comparison record. That preserves the purchase rule without overstating its reach: fare arithmetic and itinerary certainty guide the original choice, but do not determine every remedy when the service subsequently fails.

![What the Data Doesn't Tell You — London to Hull Weekend Train Fares](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/london-to-hull-weekend-train-fares-2-adv-e6c00da8.jpg)

## One Adult, One Held-Out Weekend

 The held-out London–Hull case cannot support a ticket recommendation yet: no live checkout quotes are available in the supplied evidence. Assigning dates, departures, or prices would turn an uncompleted check into a fictional result. Booking early is not a substitute for pricing the complete weekend.

 The intended case is an adult traveling Standard Class without a Railcard, outbound on Friday and back on Sunday. However, the sampled weekends have not been supplied, so a separate weekend cannot be verified as excluded from that sample. The travel dates, selected departures, booking source, and traveler’s schedule certainty remain unrecorded. No booking flow was accessed for this section.

 According to LNER’s supplied homepage extract, the operator links to dedicated “Advance tickets” and “Off-Peak tickets” pages. That establishes where further verification should begin—not what the tickets cost or whether a particular return is valid. The extract contains neither checkout prices nor the relevant weekend restrictions, and it does not establish the seller’s current Advance amendment policy.

 To complete this case reproducibly, the price record must preserve the outbound Advance amount and inbound Advance amount separately, followed by their combined checkout total. The competing Off-Peak Return must cover the same intended journeys, with its restriction code checked against both selected services. Record any checkout charges alongside the quoted fares, making clear whether a charge applies per ticket or per transaction; otherwise the apparent comparison may omit part of the purchase cost.

 The arithmetic is explicit even though its inputs are missing: combined singles cost equals outbound checkout cost plus inbound checkout cost; cash saving equals the valid return’s checkout cost minus that combined total. Percentage saving is that cash difference divided by the return’s checkout cost, expressed as a percentage. Retain the original quoted amounts, including pence, and round only the final displayed percentage. There is no defensible numerical result to insert yet.

 The rescheduling test also remains unresolved. Before attaching an administration charge to this case, verify the chosen seller’s published terms for voluntarily changing these Advance tickets. Where a charge applies separately to each amended ticket, changing both departures can trigger both charges, in addition to applicable fare differences. A per-ticket maximum must not be presented as either a universal seller policy or the total cost of rescheduling.

 The publication decision is therefore to withhold the worked-case winner until the checkout record and schedule commitment are complete. Choose the Advance pair only if both departures are firm and its combined all-in price is strictly below an available Off-Peak Return valid on those services; otherwise choose that valid return. Here, neither the qualifying Advance pair nor the valid return has been verified.

![One Adult, One Held-Out Weekend — London to Hull Weekend Train Fares](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/london-to-hull-weekend-train-fares-2-adv-e27f509e.jpg)

## How to Choose Well: Five Rules Before You Pay

 The purchase decision is not made on the search-results page. It is made on the payment page, with both legs in the basket and the restriction codes visible. Everything before that is a hypothesis. Five rules, applied in order, keep you from paying for a hypothesis.

 **Rule 1 — Uncertainty on the homeward leg kills the singles.** If a family visit, a meal, or an event could move your return departure, the Advance Single is disqualified before price enters the conversation: it binds you to one booked train. The Off-Peak Return is the candidate, but only after you confirm its permitted services actually cover the uncertainty. Check the restriction code on the return and read the last departure it allows on your travel day. A return whose validity window ends before your event plausibly finishes is not a flexible option — it is a more expensive Advance with extra steps.

 **Rule 2 — With both times settled, decide from the final two-leg basket.** The first search result shows you one leg. The basket shows you the trip. Add the outbound Advance and the inbound Advance to the basket, take the combined checkout total, then price a valid Off-Peak Return for the same two services. Choose the singles only when that complete basket is strictly cheaper. A cheap outbound fare is a decoy, not evidence — the inbound leg routinely erases the apparent saving, which is exactly why booking early does not automatically make two Advance Singles the cheaper answer.

 **Rule 3 — A changed quote is a dead quote.** If a saved quote has moved before you pay, discard the earlier comparison entirely and rebuild it from currently available prices. Rail inventory is live; a quote is a snapshot, not a reservation and not an entitlement. Yesterday's apparent saving tells you nothing about today's basket, and comparing a stale Advance total against a fresh return price is the single most common way travelers talk themselves into the wrong ticket.

 **Rule 4 — Concessions must be symmetric.** If a concession is in play, apply the same eligible discount and the same accompanying-traveller conditions to both alternatives before choosing. Never compare a discounted Advance pair against an undiscounted return, or a return priced for two travelers against singles priced for one. National Rail's discount conditions attach to the traveler and the ticket type, so an asymmetric comparison produces a winner that does not exist at checkout.

 **Rule 5 — If the "flexible" option fails the trip, stop.** When the supposed flexible alternative is a different ticket category or excludes a service you require, you do not have a comparison — you have two products that both fail. Obtain a valid replacement quote rather than forcing a winner. A forced winner is how travelers end up holding a ticket that cannot board the train they need.

| Situation | What to compare | Decision |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Homeward departure could move | Return's permitted services vs. realistic event end time | Buy the return only if its last permitted departure covers the change |
| Both departures fixed | Final two-leg basket vs. valid Off-Peak Return | Singles only if the complete basket is strictly cheaper |
| Saved quote changed before payment | Currently available prices, rebuilt from scratch | Recalculate; discard the earlier comparison |
| Concession applies | Same discount and companion conditions on both sides | Compare like with like, or do not compare |
| "Flexible" option is a different category or drops a required service | Whether each product meets the trip requirements | Stop; source a valid replacement comparison |

 Run the rules in order and the arithmetic only ever decides between two products that both fit the trip. That is the whole discipline: qualify first, price second.

Also worth reading
 [How to fly and ride through Europe](https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/04/how-to-fly-and-ride-through-europe-with-combined-air-and-rail-tickets-on-one-booking/)
·
 [Unlock seamless travel across Europe](https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/04/unlock-seamless-travel-across-europe-with-combined-air-and-rail-tickets-on-a-single-booking/)
·
 [Claim these incredible Atmos card](https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/05/claim-these-incredible-atmos-card-offers-with-companion-fares-and-discount-codes-before-they-expire/)

## What to do next

| Step | Action | Why it matters |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | On National Rail's Journey Planner, run a dated London–Hull search for your exact outbound departure and your Sunday return, holding passenger details and Railcard selections identical across both baskets. | The 45% LNER Advance advertisement is not a London–Hull quote and identifies no comparison fare; only dated results give you route-specific prices. |
| 2 | Record the combined checkout total for the two Advance Singles — outbound plus Sunday — not the outbound price alone. | An attractive outbound fare is an inventory teaser; its advantage can vanish once the Sunday journey is added. |
| 3 | Price an Off-Peak Return for the same intended London–Hull journeys in a separate basket, confirming it is actually available for those services. | The decision rule needs a valid return as the benchmark, and the supplied evidence does not confirm route-specific return availability. |
| 4 | Choose the two Advance Singles only if both departures are firm and their combined all-in price is strictly below that available Off-Peak Return; otherwise choose the valid return. | This is the whole comparison: a locked itinerary against a conditional one, judged on complete baskets. |
| 5 | Inspect the actual ticket conditions — Advance change and refund rules, and the Off-Peak Return's restriction set for weekend travel. | The 45% promotion supplies no Advance change or refund rules, and the Off-Peak extract supplies no weekend restrictions; only the conditions resolve validity. |
| 6 | Check the weekend timetable and any engineering notices for the London–Hull route before purchasing. | An advertised saving should not make the decision if the booked services are altered or unavailable. |

## Frequently Asked Questions

 **If I miss my booked Advance Single departure from King's Cross to Hull, can I use it on a later train?**

 According to National Rail's ticket-type definitions, an Advance Single buys exactly one journey on the specified booked services printed on it — miss that departure and the ticket is generally worthless.

 **How long is the return half of an Off-Peak Return valid for a Friday-out, Sunday-back London–Hull trip?**

 According to National Rail, the return portion of an Off-Peak Return is normally valid for one calendar month, subject to the ticket's actual conditions — so a Friday-out, Sunday-back trip sits comfortably inside it.

 **Does a cheap Friday outbound Advance Single guarantee a matching cheap Sunday return from Hull?**

 Advance availability is inventory-controlled, and inventory is allocated per departure and per direction, so a low-priced allocation on the Friday outbound tells you nothing about whether a matching allocation exists on the Sunday return.

 **What five checks must clear before I can run the Advance Singles vs Off-Peak Return comparison?**

 Run the comparison only after all five checks clear: both departures firm, both Advance allocations present, the correct return product identified, the itinerary confirmed direct or connecting, and the restriction code read.

 **If any one of those five checks fails, which ticket does the article say is the answer?**

 If any one fails, the Off-Peak Return is the answer.

 **Does LNER's Save 45% with Advance tickets claim establish a saving on a London–Hull weekend?**

 The 45% advertisement is not a London–Hull quote, and the supplied extract does not identify the comparison fare, qualifying departures, or whether that claim applies to this route.

## Quick answers

| What does LNER advertise about Advance tickets for this comparison? | LNER advertises “Save 45% with Advance tickets,” but the supplied extract identifies neither the comparison fare nor its applicability to London–Hull. |
| --- | --- |
| What is the useful comparison between Advance Singles and an Off-Peak Return? | The useful comparison is between completed booking baskets: the combined price of outbound and Sunday Advance Singles versus an Off-Peak Return for the intended journeys, if available. |
| What does an Advance Single buy according to National Rail's ticket-type definitions? | According to National Rail's ticket-type definitions, an Advance Single buys exactly one journey on the specified booked services printed on it — miss that departure and the ticket is generally worthless. |
| How long is the return portion of an Off-Peak Return normally valid? | According to National Rail, the return portion of an Off-Peak Return is normally valid for one calendar month, subject to the ticket's actual conditions — so a Friday-out, Sunday-back trip sits comfortably inside it. |
| What is the result if any one of the five checks fails? | If any one fails, the Off-Peak Return is the answer. |

Canonical: https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/09/london-to-hull-weekend-train-fares-2-advance-singles-vs-off-peak-return/
Markdown: https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/09/london-to-hull-weekend-train-fares-2-advance-singles-vs-off-peak-return/index.md