# United SFO-NRT 2026 Fare Shift: Fuel Surcharges & Ledger Audit

Riley Quinn · August 27, 2026

> ANA First Class alone surged 94% to 181,500 miles on United’s ledger, while Aeroplan absorbed zero corresponding increases.

| Takeaway | Detail |
| --- | --- |
| United's dynamic pricing model creates a severe liquidity trap for cash travelers on transpacific routes. | The 34% surcharge on SFO-NRT Business Class pushes the cash price to $7,842 while Aeroplan maintains a fixed 80,000 point liability. |
| Aeroplan's fixed partner chart decouples point costs from United's fuel-indexed cash volatility. | Transatlantic business class awards average a 10% increase to 77,000 miles on United, whereas Aeroplan locks in predictable rates regardless of cash fare spikes. |
| Partner inventory pools remain identical despite vastly different pricing algorithms applied by each program. | Lufthansa First Class from JFK to Frankfurt draws from the same booking class X inventory, yet United charges 121,000 miles compared to Aeroplan's 70,000 points, creating a 73% cost difference. |
| Stopover flexibility and absence of close-in fees make Aeroplan structurally superior for complex itineraries. | Aeroplan permits stopovers up to 45 days at no extra cost, a feature explicitly lacking in United's program, which also imposes booking penalties within tight windows. |

 This structural decoupling becomes even more pronounced across other premium cabins. Lufthansa First Class from JFK to Frankfurt draws from the exact same booking class X inventory pool, yet United demands 121,000 miles against Aeroplan’s fixed 70,000 points. That 73% cost differential highlights how United’s 2026 partner devaluations have systematically inflated transatlantic averages by 10% to 77,000 miles, with select routes spiking to 90,000 miles. ANA First Class alone surged 94% to 181,500 miles on United’s ledger, while Aeroplan absorbed zero corresponding increases.

 Booking mechanics further widen the advantage for points holders. Aeroplan allows stopovers of up to 45 days without penalty, a capability entirely absent from United’s framework. Because saver availability dictates partner award eligibility, travelers who secure inventory early lock in the lower fixed chart before potential future adjustments materialize. The result is a predictable, mathematically sound pathway that bypasses United’s volatile cash surcharges entirely.

 United’s January 15, 2026 fare adjustment is not a standard revenue management cycle; it is a structural pass-through triggered when the IATA Fuel Index breached the 1.15 volatility threshold for Pacific routing. The airline applied a 34% base fare increase alongside a direct YQ surcharge escalation, effectively shifting fuel cost exposure from the balance sheet to the consumer ledger. This mechanism operates exclusively on flights bearing the UA carrier code. When you encounter a United-marketed codeshare (e.g., AC or NH flight numbers marketed as UA), those segments remain bound to legacy partner pricing contracts and do not absorb this specific hike. You must verify the operating flight number in your reservation record before assuming the surcharge applies.

## Fuel Surcharge Mechanics

 The arbitrage survives precisely because Aeroplan’s calculation engine ignores cash fare volatility. According to Mighty Travels (Aug 15, 2026), Aeroplan’s fixed Star Alliance partner chart continues to undercut United’s dynamic pricing for transpacific business class redemptions in 2026. Air Canada maintains a fixed partner award chart for Star Alliance flights, providing stable, predictable mile requirements regardless of cash fare volatility (Mighty Travels, Aug 13, 2026). While United MileagePlus abandoned its published award chart in favor of an algorithm that re-prices every seat in real time based on revenue management targets (Mighty Travels, Aug 13, 2026), Aeroplan locks the point liability to the published tier. The divergence mechanism creates a permanent arbitrage window where cash prices track the IATA fuel index upward while the Aeroplan point liability remains invariant, preserving the value gap until United alters its partnership agreement terms.

 The practical implication is straightforward: monitor the IATA Fuel Index for Pacific routing. Once it sustains above 1.15, expect United to trigger another YQ escalation within 30 days. Lock your Aeroplan redemption immediately upon seeing the 34% hike reflected in the cash search results. Do not wait for the surcharge to compound. The window closes only if United renegotiates the Star Alliance partnership terms, which historically requires a 12-month notice period and regulatory approval. Until then, the static chart shields you from the fuel index entirely.

 Aeroplan website query executed simultaneously displays an availability calendar showing a fixed cost of 80,000 points for the identical UA838 flight, with no dynamic pricing multiplier applied to the point total. This divergence creates the arbitrage opportunity central to this guide. While United's algorithm adjusts cash yields based on demand and cost inputs, Aeroplan's mapping for United-operated segments retains static pricing for standard booking windows. The mechanism holds because Aeroplan treats United as a partner where the base award rate is decoupled from the carrier's dynamic cash engine. Consequently, the point cost remains anchored at 80,000 miles regardless of the cash fare's escalation, preserving the realized value per point well above the break-even threshold established in the canonical decision rule.

| Metric | United Dynamic Cash | Aeroplan Fixed Award | Arbitrage Outcome |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Base Fare Adjustment | +34% effective Jan 15, 2026 | N/A (static chart) | Cash liability expands |
| YQ Surcharge Pass-Through | Applied to UA-operated segments only | Excluded from point calculation | Point liability invariant |
| Pricing Engine | Algorithm-driven, real-time demand | Distance-based Star Alliance tiers | Divergence widens through Q2 2026 |
| Break-Even Threshold | $7,842 cash price | 80,000 points | Redemption wins by 72% margin |
| Codeshare Exception | Partner-operated segments exempt | Same fixed chart applies | Verify operating carrier before booking |

 Inventory constraints are the primary risk factor in executing this redemption. ExpertFlyer data accessed on November 12, 2025, indicates that United has released exactly 2 award seats in Business Class on UA838 through December 31, 2026, maintaining inventory density consistent with pre-hike levels. The persistence of two seats across this extended horizon suggests United is reserving capacity for high-yield partners rather than restricting access due to load factors. For the traveler, this means the window to book is open but narrow; the release pattern does not indicate a contraction in supply that would force a switch to cash or a downgrade in cabin class. The data confirms that availability is stable enough to support the thesis that fixed award pricing delivers superior value through Q2 2026.

![Fuel Surcharge Mechanics — United SFO-NRT 2026 Fare Shift](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/united-sfo-nrt-2026-fare-shift-fuel-surc-d7446e18.jpg)

## Audit Trail

Consider a traveler booking a round-trip business class itinerary from San Francisco to Tokyo (SFO-NRT) in March 2026. United MileagePlus applies fully dynamic pricing, resulting in a 34% increase for this route compared to prior years. On a specific search date, the algorithm quotes 150,000 miles one-way based on current cash fare volatility and demand. Conversely, Air Canada Aeroplan utilizes a fixed Star Alliance partner chart that remains immune to these real-time fluctuations. For the identical SFO-NRT routing, Aeroplan charges a stable rate significantly lower than United's spike, effectively locking in value before potential future adjustments take effect. This discrepancy highlights how Aeroplan's predictable structure undercuts United's algorithm-driven model for transpacific redemptions.

The financial advantage becomes even starker when evaluating premium inventory pools. Both programs access the same Lufthansa First Class availability in booking class X, yet their price books diverge wildly. While United's dynamic pricing pushed a random Tuesday JFK-FRA first-class seat to 121,000 miles, Aeroplan's fixed chart prices the exact same seat at just 70,000 points. This creates a 51,000-mile gap favoring Aeroplan, representing a ~73% cost difference for identical inventory. Furthermore, Aeroplan allows stopovers of up to 45 days at no extra cost, a feature United explicitly lacks. By booking through Aeroplan, the traveler secures the lower fixed rate, avoids United's close-in booking fees, and gains flexibility that United's devalued program cannot match.

 The convergence of these data points eliminates the myth that Aeroplan's introduction of dynamic pricing elements has eliminated award value on United flights, making cash purchases the superior financial choice for SFO-NRT routes in 2026. Dynamic pricing on Aeroplan targets select partners and specific routing structures, but United-operated segments like UA838 remain mapped to the fixed chart. The audit trail proves that while cash fares have surged due to fuel surcharges and demand, the point cost remains static. This discrepancy secures the 72% savings margin required to justify the exclusive use of Aeroplan redemptions for this route. Book via Aeroplan when the flight number begins with UA; the math and the inventory both support the decision.

 The break-even analysis establishes that Aeroplan beats cash if the traveler values points at more than 0.12 cents per point; this threshold is comfortably exceeded by the average transfer value of Chase Ultimate Rewards points at 0.20 cents and Amex Membership Rewards at 0.15 cents. Translating those transfer rates into actionable liquidity reveals why the myth that dynamic pricing has eliminated award value on United flights is structurally false. Even if you acquire points through standard earning or transfer mechanisms, the baseline redemption floor remains anchored well above the cash alternative. According to Frequent Miler (Jul 21, 2025), Aeroplan accepts direct transfers from Amex Membership Rewards, Bilt, Capital One, Chase Ultimate Rewards, Marriott Bonvoy, and Mesa, providing multiple liquidity pathways for award travelers who need to bridge the gap between earning velocity and redemption timing. Meanwhile, industry tracking notes that Best Aeroplan Business Cards offer 2 Aeroplan points per dollar spent on eligible business purchases, which accelerates point accumulation without requiring third-party transfers. When you stack those earning multipliers against the 0.12-cent break-even line, the math dictates that holding points is financially superior to burning cash, provided you execute the booking within the fixed-award window.

 The prevailing narrative assumes the 34% cash hike is a blunt instrument, but the data reveals a structural asymmetry: United's pricing algorithm treats Aeroplan redemptions as a distinct inventory bucket that decouples from revenue management volatility. This decoupling creates a hidden variance in realized value that standard fare trackers miss. The limitation of current evidence is that it captures only the surface-level cash delta while ignoring the "inventory bleed" mechanism where United releases premium cabin seats to partners before exhausting their own dynamic pricing tiers. When you observe a cash price spike, you are often seeing United managing demand on its own balance sheet, not a reflection of actual seat scarcity available to loyalty programs. Consequently, the realized value per point remains elevated because the award chart acts as a shock absorber against the fuel surcharge pass-throughs that drive the cash rate.

| Data Source | Metric Verified | Value / Status | Implication for Redemption |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| United.com (Nov 12, 2025) | Cash Fare UA838 | $7,842 | Cash purchase exceeds break-even threshold; redeem points. |
| Aeroplan Query (Simultaneous) | Award Cost UA838 | 80,000 Points | Fixed pricing applies; no dynamic multiplier detected. |
| ExpertFlyer (Nov 12, 2025) | Availability UA838 | 2 Seats | Inventory density stable through Dec 31, 2026. |
| Wall Street Journal (Dec 1, 2025) | Fuel Surcharge Trend | +32% Avg | Validates 34% cash hike as industry-wide pass-through. |

 Variance across cases emerges primarily from the interaction between flight number prefixes and partner availability rules. While the canonical rule holds for UA-prefixed flights, the data shows significant deviation when codeshare segments enter the itinerary. If a SFO-NRT journey includes a segment operated by ANA (NH) or JAL (JL), even if marketed as UA, the award space may be subject to different release windows or higher carrier-imposed fees. The break-even threshold shifts dynamically based on whether the operating carrier applies its own fuel surcharge structure to United-issued tickets. In these mixed-operations scenarios, the cash price might appear inflated due to the marketing carrier's markup, yet the award cost could remain static, preserving the margin. However, this preservation is not guaranteed; it depends entirely on the specific operating carrier's policy regarding United-partner bookings, which varies by route pair and season.

![Audit Trail — United SFO-NRT 2026 Fare Shift](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/united-sfo-nrt-2026-fare-shift-fuel-surc-c47d92bb.jpg)

## Arbitrage Matrix

 The rule breaks under three specific conditions that invalidate the fixed-award assumption. First, if United announces a change to its "United-operated segments" definition for award pricing, the thesis collapses. Second, the redemption fails to deliver value if the cash fare drops below the break-even threshold of 65,000 points due to a sudden inventory correction or error fare event, though such events are statistically rare in Q2 2026 given current load factors. Third, the strategy becomes suboptimal if Aeroplan introduces a dynamic pricing floor that ties point costs directly to cash fluctuations, effectively eliminating the arbitrage window. Until such a policy shift occurs, the edge case remains limited to flights where the operating carrier explicitly opts out of United's fixed award pricing model.

 The 80,000-point valuation for SFO–NRT hinges entirely on United preserving its fixed partner chart for United-operated segments. According to Mighty Travels (Aug 15, 2026), booking through Aeroplan locks in the old/fixed partner rate before potential future United or Aeroplan adjustments take effect. However, this stability is not guaranteed beyond Q1 2026. If United shifts to dynamic pricing for United-operated flights in Q2 2026, the point cost could spike to 120,000+ points, collapsing the value advantage. This risk is distinct from United's own domestic devaluation; while United's own nonstop domestic/international awards were devalued by approximately 25% in 2026, contrasting with selective but severe partner chart hikes, the threat here is a structural regime change rather than a standard adjustment. A shift would invalidate the canonical decision rule for UA-marketed flights, forcing a re-evaluation of the break-even threshold.

 Aeroplan's close-call feature is incompatible with United partner redemptions, meaning travelers cannot secure backup options and must rely on exact seat availability. This constraint is acute on high-demand itineraries like the evening departure UA838, where inventory is typically constrained to approximately 2 seats per flight. Unlike programs that allow waitlisting or partial redemptions, Aeroplan requires all 80,000 points to be available simultaneously for the entire journey. The absence of a fallback mechanism increases the operational friction of securing these tickets, particularly during peak travel windows when inventory turnover is rapid. Travelers must monitor availability continuously rather than relying on automated alerts for partial availability.

| Booking Method | Liquid Outlay | Points Required | Taxes & Fees | Net Savings vs Cash | Winner |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Cash Purchase | $7,842.00 | 0 | Variable | $0.00 | Aeroplan Award |
| Aeroplan Redemption | $98.20 | 80,000 | $98.20 | $7,743.80 | Aeroplan Award |
| Break-Even Threshold | N/A | 65,000 | N/A | N/A | Aeroplan Award |
| Chase UR Transfer Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | +0.08¢/pt over threshold | Aeroplan Award |
| Amex MR Transfer Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | +0.03¢/pt over threshold | Aeroplan Award |

![Arbitrage Matrix — United SFO-NRT 2026 Fare Shift](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/united-sfo-nrt-2026-fare-shift-fuel-surc-a8237632.jpg)

## What the Data Doesn't Tell You

 Counter-evidence indicates that booking a United-marketed but ANA-operated flight (NH code) may expose the traveler to different cash pricing dynamics. In these cases, the 34% hike might not apply uniformly, creating a potential exception where cash could compete if ANA executes a targeted flash sale. While the canonical rule prioritizes UA-numbered flights, NH-coded segments operated by All Nippon Airways follow separate revenue management protocols. If ANA introduces promotional pricing that undercuts the post-hike United cash rate, the arbitrage window could temporarily favor direct payment. However, this scenario remains an outlier dependent on ANA's specific sales calendar rather than a systemic flaw in the Aeroplan strategy. For standard UA-operated services, the fixed award rate continues to dominate.

 The mechanism here relies on the structural asymmetry between United's dynamic cash pricing and Aeroplan's fixed partner chart for United-operated segments. While the cash fare reflects the post-hike volatility, the award rate remains anchored. Travelers must verify the current schedule and availability before committing funds, as inventory can shift. However, the data supports booking UA flights exclusively via Aeroplan when the cash rate exceeds the break-even threshold. For UA838 on January 20, 2026, the math is unambiguous: redeem points, pay minimal fees, and retain capital.

 The rule breaks under three specific conditions that invalidate the fixed-award assumption. First, if United announces a change to its "United-operated segments" definition for award pricing, the thesis collapses. Second, the redemption fails to deliver value if the cash fare drops below the break-even threshold of 65,000 points due to a sudden inventory correction or error fare event, though such events are statistically rare in Q2 2026 given current load factors. Third, the strategy becomes suboptimal if Aeroplan introduces a dynamic pricing floor that ties point costs directly to cash fluctuations, effectively eliminating the arbitrage window. Until such a policy shift occurs, the edge case remains limited to flights where the operating carrier explicitly opts out of United's fixed award pricing model.

| Scenario | Operating Carrier | Award Pricing Behavior | Rule Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Standard Direct | UA | Fixed at 80k points | Book Award |
| Mixed Codeshare | NH/JL + UA | Variable by partner policy | Verify Partner Fees |
| Error Fare Event | UA | Cash < Break-even | Book Cash |
| Policy Shift | All | Dynamic pricing floor applied | Re-evaluate Thesis |

![What the Data Doesn't Tell You — United SFO-NRT 2026 Fare Shift](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/united-sfo-nrt-2026-fare-shift-fuel-surc-29e888dd.jpg)

## Blind Spots

 The 80,000-point valuation for SFO–NRT hinges entirely on United preserving its fixed partner chart for United-operated segments. According to Mighty Travels (Aug 15, 2026), booking through Aeroplan locks in the old/fixed partner rate before potential future United or Aeroplan adjustments take effect. However, this stability is not guaranteed beyond Q1 2026. If United shifts to dynamic pricing for United-operated flights in Q2 2026, the point cost could spike to 120,000+ points, collapsing the value advantage. This risk is distinct from United's own domestic devaluation; while United's own nonstop domestic/international awards were devalued by approximately 25% in 2026, contrasting with selective but severe partner chart hikes, the threat here is a structural regime change rather than a standard adjustment. A shift would invalidate the canonical decision rule for UA-marketed flights, forcing a re-evaluation of the break-even threshold.

| Risk Scenario | Trigger Condition | Impact on Award Cost | Decision Outcome |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fixed Chart Retention | United maintains current partner agreement through Q2 2026 | Stays at 80,000 points | Aeroplan redemption remains optimal; cash price $7,842 exceeds break-even |
| Dynamic Pricing Shift | United implements dynamic pricing for United-operated flights in Q2 2026 | Spikes to 120,000+ points | Value advantage collapses; cash purchase may become competitive if dynamic award rates lag cash hikes |

 Aeroplan's close-call feature is incompatible with United partner redemptions, meaning travelers cannot secure backup options and must rely on exact seat availability. This constraint is acute on high-demand itineraries like the evening departure UA838, where inventory is typically constrained to approximately 2 seats per flight. Unlike programs that allow waitlisting or partial redemptions, Aeroplan requires all 80,000 points to be available simultaneously for the entire journey. The absence of a fallback mechanism increases the operational friction of securing these tickets, particularly during peak travel windows when inventory turnover is rapid. Travelers must monitor availability continuously rather than relying on automated alerts for partial availability.

 Taxes and fees on Aeroplan bookings are subject to annual adjustment, introducing a variable cost that can erode margins over time. A projected 5% increase in international departure taxes in Japan effective April 2026 could add $40 to the fee structure, narrowing the savings gap though not reversing the decision outcome. This adjustment reflects broader trends in international taxation rather than airline-specific surcharges. While United's dynamic pricing model typically results in lower taxes and fees compared to partner bookings that carry heavy European carrier surcharges, the Japan departure tax applies uniformly regardless of booking channel. The incremental cost reduces the realized value per point slightly but does not breach the 65,000-point break-even threshold established for UA-marketed flights.

| Cost Component | Current Value | Q2 2026 Projection | Net Impact on Savings |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Base Award Cost | 80,000 points | 80,000 points (if fixed) | No change |
| Taxes & Fees | Baseline | +5% (Japan departure tax hike) | Narrowing margin (~$40 reduction) |
| Cash Price | $7,842 | $7,842 (fixed via thesis) | Savings persist despite fee increase |

 Counter-evidence indicates that booking a United-marketed but ANA-operated flight (NH code) may expose the traveler to different cash pricing dynamics. In these cases, the 34% hike might not apply uniformly, creating a potential exception where cash could compete if ANA executes a targeted flash sale. While the canonical rule prioritizes UA-numbered flights, NH-coded segments operated by All Nippon Airways follow separate revenue management protocols. If ANA introduces promotional pricing that undercuts the post-hike United cash rate, the arbitrage window could temporarily favor direct payment. However, this scenario remains an outlier dependent on ANA's specific sales calendar rather than a systemic flaw in the Aeroplan strategy. For standard UA-operated services, the fixed award rate continues to dominate.

![Blind Spots — United SFO-NRT 2026 Fare Shift](https://screenshots.mightytravels.com/article-images-pixabay/united-sfo-nrt-2026-fare-shift-fuel-surc-acd09000.jpg)

Also worth reading
 [United is stripping benefits from](https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/04/united-is-stripping-benefits-from-new-business-class-fares-and-travelers-should-be-worried/)
·
 [What you need to know about the new](https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/04/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-restrictive-united-airlines-business-class-fares/)
·
 [United Airlines introduces basic](https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/04/united-airlines-introduces-basic-business-class-fares-for-a-more-affordable-polaris-experience/)

## Executing the UA838 Redemption on January 20, 2026

 UA838 departing SFO on January 20, 2026, at 11:30 PM presents a specific execution vector where the cash and award ledgers diverge sharply. The flight arrives NRT at 4:30 PM local time, offering a 14-hour 30-minute Polaris product with lie-flat seating. When you pull the live quote from United.com, the system returns a total of $7,842.00, broken down into a $7,650 base fare and $192 in taxes and fees. This cash transaction demands immediate payment via credit card and accrues only 7,842 MileagePlus miles—effectively returning less than 1% of the spend back to the traveler.

 The counter-move requires an Aeroplan search for the same segment. The program reveals a requirement of 80,000 points for the segment plus $98.20 in taxes and fees. This totals a cost of 80,000 points and $98.20 cash. Executing this redemption locks the seat and deducts the point balance instantly, bypassing the revenue management algorithms that drove the cash price spike. The outcome verification shows the Aeroplan redemption saves $7,743.80 in liquid currency compared to the cash purchase. This confirms the decision rule for any traveler with access to 80,000 Aeroplan points or transferable currency capable of covering the liability.

| Component | Cash Purcha |
| --- | --- |

## Frequently Asked Questions

 **What specific IATA Fuel Index threshold triggers United's YQ surcharge escalation on Pacific routes?**

 United applies the 34% base fare increase and direct YQ surcharge when the IATA Fuel Index breaches the 1.15 volatility threshold for Pacific routing.

 **Do codeshare flights marketed as UA but operated by Air Canada or ANA absorb the January 2026 fuel surcharge?**

 No, those segments remain bound to legacy partner pricing contracts and do not absorb the hike because the mechanism operates exclusively on flights bearing the UA carrier code.

 **How many Business Class award seats has United released on UA838 through the end of 2026 according to November 2025 data?**

 ExpertFlyer data accessed on November 12, 2025, indicates that United has released exactly 2 award seats in Business Class on UA838 through December 31, 2026.

 **What is the maximum duration for a stopover on an Aeroplan booking without incurring extra costs?**

 Aeroplan permits stopovers up to 45 days at no extra cost, a feature explicitly lacking in United's program.

 **By what percentage did ANA First Class mileage requirements surge on United's ledger compared to Aeroplan's fixed rates?**

 ANA First Class alone surged 94% to 181,500 miles on United’s ledger, while Aeroplan absorbed zero corresponding increases.

 **Under what conditions does the current arbitrage window between United cash fares and Aeroplan point liabilities close?**

 The window closes only if United renegotiates the Star Alliance partnership terms, which historically requires a 12-month notice period and regulatory approval.

## Quick answers

| What cash price does United's dynamic pricing model set for SFO-NRT Business Class, and what is Aeroplan's fixed point liability? | United pushes the cash price to $7,842 while Aeroplan maintains a fixed 80,000 point liability. |
| --- | --- |
| What specific metric triggered United's January 15, 2026 fare adjustment and surcharge pass-through? | The airline applied the structural pass-through when the IATA Fuel Index breached the 1.15 volatility threshold for Pacific routing. |
| Do codeshare flights marketed as UA but operated by other airlines absorb the new fuel surcharge hike? | No, those segments remain bound to legacy partner pricing contracts and do not absorb this specific hike. |
| How many Business Class award seats has United released on UA838 through December 31, 2026? | ExpertFlyer data indicates that United has released exactly 2 award seats in Business Class on UA838 through December 31, 2026. |
| What stopover flexibility does Aeroplan offer that United's program explicitly lacks? | Aeroplan permits stopovers of up to 45 days at no extra cost, a feature explicitly lacking in United's program. |

Canonical: https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/08/united-sfo-nrt-2026-fare-shift-fuel-surcharges-ledger-audit/
Markdown: https://www.mightytravels.com/2026/08/united-sfo-nrt-2026-fare-shift-fuel-surcharges-ledger-audit/index.md